On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 13:39 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Jonathan Dieter (jdieter gmail com) said: > > He did bring up some other very good points, though. Xz's compression > > output hasn't been set in sand, much less stone. The file format will > > stay the same, but the same command-line options may result in different > > compressed files. > > ... in what way does he mean this? Obviously passing -1 ... -9 causes > different output, much like it does in gzip/bzip2/etc. He means that the file generated using -5 in the future may be different than the file generated using -5 now. Jonathan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part