[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Opinions on packaging ATLAS (for the x86 architecture)



On 09-09-25 10:41:56, Deji Akingunola wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I would like to know your opinion (or any guideline, if it exists) 
> for the best way to package the ATLAS library for the x86 arch ATM. 
 ...

> i). Create a generic x86 'atlas' main package for the P6 
> architecture,
 ...

Currently, the default atlas contains SSE and no SSE.  AIUI, even no 
SSE is faster than no ATLAS.  Still, I would hope that the proper 
variant is chosen at run time, or at least install time.  If so, the 
proper packaging for ATLAS is a single package built for all x86 (or 
x64 or SPARK or whatever) variants.  (My own machine would benefit from 
a 3DNOW build.)

-- 
____________________________________________________________________
TonyN.:'                       <mailto:tonynelson georgeanelson com>
      '                              <http://www.georgeanelson.com/>



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]