[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: ABRT considered painful
- From: Przemek Klosowski <przemek klosowski nist gov>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: ABRT considered painful
- Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 10:40:35 -0500
On 01/02/2010 09:32 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
Moreover ABRT does not install the whole debuginfo package but only copies the
needed specific .debug files out of it somewhere - as know the ABRT people.
What happens if the software version N crashes, then the updates install
a later version, and the ABRT tool is run afterwards? With
updates coming fast and furious, this is not uncommon, and I think
it leads to confusion when the old stack trace is interpreted against
the debugging info from the different software version.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]