Re: [Fedora-directory-devel] Samba4 onto Fedora DS

[Pete Rowley <prowley redhat com>]

Andrew Bartlett wrote:

On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 15:35 -0700, Pete Rowley wrote:

> > Why not deal with the specific problems that arise when /adding/ the AD 
> >    
> >
> > schema? I'm guessing that would be a shorter list?
> >    
>
> Because the AD schema is a whole schema, not just some extra
> attributes/objectClasses, I need to be able to replace 'person', and
> many other classes that Microsoft has modified.  
>
> Once I start replacing classes, I need to know the list of 'if I replace
> this, bad things happen'.
>  
The problem is the list of broken things is open ended. Perhaps we 
should drill down on a specific example (like the "person" objectclass 
and associated attributes) and look at what is different. At least that 
will make sure we are all talking about the same thing and the folks on 
the list might have more targetted suggestions.

Though, I thought the plan was to make the DS look like AD through 
Sambas lens?  Are we just talking about an interim development situation 
until you add the "lens"? If so, I say break what you like. Otherwise I 
would have big concerns about integration with existing DS deployments.

--
Pete

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature