Re: [Fedora-directory-users] upperlimit on uidNumber

["George Holbert" <gholbert broadcom com>]

> For some reason, I just assumed that they would be unsigned integers.

That would make more sense to me too... since uid numbers can't be 
negative (as far as I know)?
oh well :)


mj sci fi wrote:
> > http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/FAQ_80_6231.shtm
>
> Aha, they are stored as signed integers, so the actual number is in 
> the 2 billion range... For some reason, I just assumed that they would 
> be unsigned integers.
>
> Thanks for the pointer!
>
> --
> mike
>
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users