Re: Documentation project status

[Daniel Gonzalez <dgonzo optonline net>]

Sorry for intruding, but I'm a newcomer to this list and was reading the thread regarding Red Hat documentation and it not being open source. It seems that there is a "publisher's edition" of Red Hat docs that are being used right now... Could anyone here explain what is the difference between the official Red Hat docs and this publisher edition?

http://linuxcentral.com/catalog/?prod_code=B000-352&id=C1C0aAmWPDXCs

If I'm speaking out of my arse, please let me know

Regards
Dan Gonzalez
dgonzo optonline net
spam_me_silly linux net

 




On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 20:38:13 +0000
Dave Pawson <dpawson nildram co uk> wrote:

> At 20:15 29/12/2003, you wrote:
> > >>>>> "Dave" == Dave Pawson <dpawson nildram co uk> writes:
> >Dave> Please tell your bosses I think they are a bunch of merchant bankers.
> >...
> >
> >I'm sorry you find this upsetting.
> 
> A waste. Totally. Disgust is more appropriate than upset.
> 
> As for re-writing it all?
>    My guess, Redhat will have lost its user base by then.
> 
> Can you see *any* logic in this position Edward?
> 
> regards DaveP
> 
> 
> 
> --
> fedora-docs-list mailing list
> fedora-docs-list redhat com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list