Re: New tracker

[Dave Pawson <davep dpawson co uk>]

On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 18:43, Karsten Wade wrote:
> > Karsten, did you have a 'techie' review in your process document?
> 
> In my mind, I thought of this as part of the editor role.  However, that
> might be asking too many skills of an editor - grammar/writing and
> technical review.  There is some value in having it be a separate role.

In an ideal world, give (the html version) to the author of the tool?
Believe me, I've written about stuff I really don't understand; so I
agree its expecting a bit much :-) Some people can, others can't.
~Be nice to recognise that?


> 
> Since one person can fill many roles, 

+1, but the task needs doing (my earlier point), hence recognising that
is good.




> 
> The key in that process which might not have been obvious is -- it's all
> about writers and editors.  Everything from acceptance as in-progress
> for Fedora docs to publication on fedora.redhat.com needs to be an
> agreement between the author(s) and the editor(s).

And if needed, the techies who understand what this particular XYZ does?


> 
> Which reminds me, I need to find someone to edit the FC2 SELinux FAQ
> before it can go live ...

Not me!
I've enough faq work :-)


-- 
Regards DaveP.
XSLT&Docbook  FAQ
http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl