[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: editors
- From: Dave Pawson <davep dpawson co uk>
- To: For participants of the docs project <fedora-docs-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: editors
- Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:09:17 +0100
On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 18:56, Karsten Wade wrote:
> Here are some further ideas about the role of an editor:
<snip/>
> * Should there be an editorial board? Such a board would oversee the
> Fedora docs, make sure we are adhering to our standards, filling in
> holes, following or advancing our process, etc.
Were there enough of us here I might agree. Beginning to sniff
bureaucracy?
>
> * Also, much of the editing traffic can be in bugzilla, as each document
> will have it's own bug throughout it's lifecycle.
It took me nearly ten minutes to enter a 'bug'.
I'm reluctant to use that Karsten?
A DMS surely isn't needed as yet?
The only additional tool I'd like at the moment is a 'notice board' |
wiki to keep track of what's going on, a todo list for the group etc?
Use that as a DMS? Certainly could be used to track docs.
--
Regards DaveP.
XSLT&Docbook FAQ
http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]