[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Elements of Style and the documentation-guide
- From: Rahul Sundaram <rahulsundaram yahoo co in>
- To: For participants of the docs project <fedora-docs-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Elements of Style and the documentation-guide
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 23:14:37 +0100 (BST)
Hi
> I would argue that you can't slap an FDL on it (and
> why bother anyway?),
> because that puts specific restrictions on its use.
> However, there is no
> reason it can't be distributed along with the other
> FDP materials,
> without the FDL license and instead bearing a simple
> statement that it
> is public domain material.
afaik i know you can relicense PD stuff as FDL'ed just
like revised BSD licenses can be relicensed as GPL. PD
may not even hold as a valid distribution license
http://www.linuxmafia.com/faq/Licensing_and_Law/public-domain.html
you might want to use a liberal license like MIT
instead of public domain. I also suggest to the fedora
doc team to consider including creative commons
attribution share alike license and a new fedora legal
mailing list seems to be required
regards
Rahul Sundaram
________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your partner online. http://yahoo.shaadi.com/india-matrimony/
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]