On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 05:58 -0700, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> >
> > What Rahul suggests is indeed how many people have
> > solicited peer input,
> > by using fedora-docs-list.
>
> which is how LDP peer reviews are done. I have
> submitted a outline to this list before on that
>
> http://www.tldp.org/LDP/LDP-Author-Guide/html/process.html
One difference I see is that the peer review is done by an assigned
person after sending the doc to submit en tldp org That peer reviewer
sounds like our assigned editor.
What we have been practicing with on-list discussions seems different
from that process. It's a step _before_ having an editor assigned. For
right now, this seems to make sense to help get a document in good shape
for editing.
I can see that in the future, on-list discussion might be too much for
peer reviews. I hope we do get to be that busy. :)
- Karsten
--
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41
Red Hat SELinux Guide
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part