Re: documentation scope (Re: why o why [off topic])

[Stuart Ellis <s ellis fastmail co uk>]

On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 11:24 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote:
> Just like the Fedora Project, we cover only free software.  Our first
> priority is to software that is in Core or Extras.  Stand-alone docs
> that cover software not in Core or Extras is fine.  Docs covering a
> subject area that has several choices will cover the choices in Core or
> Extra primarily.  Choices that are outside of the project are noted as
> not being "supported by Fedora".

Do we have an existing document that could cover policy for
scope/lifecycle of docs (what we accept, how we support it, process of
obsoleting old work) ?  These issues don't seem to neatly fit just Quick
Start, Documentation or CVS Usage.