[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Random "Topics" Question

On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 19:49 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 16:30 -0700, tuxxer wrote:
> > I was checking out the list of "ideas without owners" to see if there
> > was anything that I could pick up.  I didn't see anything without an
> > owner in the attachment Tammy put in there many moons ago.  Are the
> > subjects listed there actively being worked on by the people to whom
> > they've been assigned?  Or have they been abandoned?
> I don't see anything active in the list there.  But I have two documents
> -- bugs #129738 and #129739 -- that I simply don't have time to edit.
> Both need significant editorial work and technical assurance to get them
> ready for publication.  Care to try your hand?

Sure, I can give it a shot.  I haven't edited anything, before, so this
will be interesting.  ;-)

> And maybe this brings up an interesting question -- we may need a
> tracker bug for editorial.  Then we'll have:
>   * Tracker for ideas without writers/owners
>   * Tracker for documents without editors assigned
>   * Tracker for documents in progress
> Does anyone have any objections?  I'll wait a suitable period before
> entering bugs accordingly.

Sounds like a good idea.  There doesn't seem to be any real designation
between authors and editors.  That's kind of why I went to bugzilla and
this list with the hardening overview.  I think this might be a "quick
pick" kind of thing, where if someone didn't have time or any idea for
authoring, they could grab something waiting for editing.


echo "uvyyfsAdpy/ofu" | perl -pe 's/(.)/chr(ord($1) - 1)/ge'
gpg:  57EB F948 76AE 25BC E340  EFA9 FAF6 E1AC F1E1 1EA1

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]