why o why

[Karsten Wade]

On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 13:45 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 12:25 -0500, Eric Rostetter wrote:
> > Quoting "Paul W. Frields" <stickster at gmail.com>:
> > 
> > > [...snip...]
> > > 
> > > Jeff Kinz wrote:
> > > > Apparently you can submit a doc in just about any format you want.  This
> > > > policy was unknown to me (Something else to put into the FDOC Guide :) )
> > > > or I would have submitted my doc in html or text format.
> > > 
> > > This is on the Wiki, but I think the Documentation Guide (as canon)
> > > should probably contain a prominent statement to this effect as well.
> > 
> > I've found no link from the web pages to the wiki, so either there is none,
> > or it isn't obvious.  Hence, the wiki is of no use to someone starting
> > to participate in the project, as they don't know about the wiki.
> 
> Excellent point, can you file a bug for this?  We should get it changed
> ASAP, unless there's a good reason for it not to be there... I can't
> think what that might be.

He attached this and many other suggestions to this bug:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=155642

I added some links to the Wiki and a few other of the suggestions,
details in the bug report, changes live within the hour.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint:  2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115    5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41   
                       Red Hat SELinux Guide
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20050424/e9cbacce/attachment.sig>