On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:59:18AM +0200, Jos Vos wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 10:46:47AM +0100, Tim Waugh wrote: > > > However, aside from images, what other things would we need from an > > XSL-FO processor? My thinking is that if "all" that's missing for us > > in xmlroff is the images rewrite, it might be quite a nice project to > > focus on. > > What about FOP (Java-based, from the Apache project)? Does that work > with GCJ (I only tried it with Sun Java IIRC)? It is far from complete, > but it more or less works. Other discussions on this list have talked about FOP, but I haven't seen any conclusions yet. Just pointing out that FOP is not the only other usable XSL-FO processor out there. Tim. */
Attachment:
pgp00008.pgp
Description: PGP signature