У чет, 07. 12 2006. у 20:27 -0500, Paul W. Frields пише: > On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 13:15 -0500, Igor Miletic wrote: > > У сре, 06. 12 2006. у 07:55 -0800, Karsten Wade пише: > > > > > We should follow the modular style being used for the Fedora > > > Administration Guide now. So, as a first interesting exercise, can you > > > create/update a page like this one for the > > > Docs/Drafts/SoftwareManagementGuide: > > > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/Drafts/AdministrationGuide/Contributors > > > > > > The basic idea is to have a table with each chapter (module) in its own > > > row. Then you can pick one or a few chapters to begin work on, putting > > > yourself down as the '''Contributor'''. > > > > > > John most likely wants to continue working on the FSMG, and you can see > > > what other writers are interested. > > > > I created the draft page here: > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/Drafts/SoftwareManagementGuide/Contributors > > > > For now all links point to existing pages. I put myself for the Managing > > Software section, it seems to cover the yum part well, maybe I should > > add the pirut part with an example and possibly yumex part as well (i.e. > > show how to install it through pirut and then show how to use it)? > > > > Also, any other ideas are welcome too. > > I would stick with pup/pirut for now. That satisfies 90% of users' > needs. The extra features of yumex are really only interesting or > useful to a pool of people who already have expertise. As an example, > I've been using RPM packages for almost ten years and I rarely need to > use anything besides pup, pirut, or the occasional yum CLI myself. > Ok, then it is just pup and pirut too add. I think yum is covered well. Thanks, Igor
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ово је део поруке са дигиталним потписом