fdp-info-*.xml a generated file?

[Paul W. Frields]

On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 10:19 -0600, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
> Uttered Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com>, spake thus:
> 
> > If fdp-info-*.xml is a generated file (right?) should we -not- check a
> > version into CVS?  When the rpm-info.xml is present, the fdp-info file
> > is created from that, right?
> 
> That is correct.  The "fdp-info-*.xml" files are generated and should
> not be checked into CVS.
> 
> If make(1) complains about not finding an "fdp-info-*.xml" file,
> there is something wrong with "Makefile.common".
> 
> AIUI, stickster was helping with this.  If you get this answer and
> it's still broken, let me know and I'll investigate.

Yup, on the case.  (For whatever that's worth.)  I noticed this at
checkout this morning and will remove the offending files if Karsten
hasn't done so already.

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20060211/0bf59e28/attachment.sig>