[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: install-guide rpm-info.xml,1.2,1.3



re: Commit below --

On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 18:04 -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
> Log Message:
> Dates must be in ctime(3) format, not ISO format.
> 
> TODO: We need an XSL magic to translate the dates if they have dashes.

> Index: rpm-info.xml
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/docs/install-guide/rpm-info.xml,v
> retrieving revision 1.2
> retrieving revision 1.3
> diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
> --- rpm-info.xml	17 Jan 2006 22:49:29 -0000	1.2
> +++ rpm-info.xml	17 Jan 2006 23:04:15 -0000	1.3
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
>  <!--PLEASE ADD A TRANSLATION FOR EACH ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE.-->
>    </titles>
>    <changelog order="newest-first">
> -    <revision date="2006-01-17" number="0" role="rpm">
> +    <revision date="Tue Jan 17 2006" number="0" role="rpm">
>        <author worker="megacoder"/>
>        <details>Added initial empty RPM revision to test packaging.</details>
>      </revision>

The "make clog" target takes care of this automatically.  I would
recommend folks using that target whenever possible since it minimizes
hassle.  If you edit manually, well, just respect the normal rules for
such things.  If you break the revision's @date attribute, the rpmbuild
process will tell you what you did wrong (i.e. %changelog date is not in
proper format).

Since no one will be creating rpm-info.xml files that have any RPM
revisions yet, there shouldn't be any cruft to worry about.

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]