On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 15:26 -0800, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 16:48 -0600, Tommy Reynolds wrote: > > Hello, All! > > > > Currently, the RPM packaging is geared to produce two types of RPM: > > > > 1) A .src.rpm whose content is somewhat similar to a CVS checkout; and > > > > 2) A .noarch.rpm whose content is targeted to the GNOME/KDE help > > infrastructure. > > > > Should we also include the rendered HTML files in the .noarch.rpm or > > should we have an additional version? > > What's the use case for additional rendered HTML files? Local URIs to use via file:/// in Firefox. Maybe linked from the relnotes. I'd like to see there be a sort of envar $FEDORA_NEAREST_DOCS_URI that can be set for a user so that Firefox goes to this URI for documentation. That lets people get content locally when offline or behind a restrictive firewall. Or am I just weird? - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Content Services Fedora Documentation Project http://www.redhat.com/docs http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part