Sorry to reply to myself, but in all my editorial blustering and
buffoonery, I not only mixed up my footnote ordering while revising my
reply, but failed to actually include the footnote URLs at all. :-(
(Something tells me a better email composer would help here.) Here they
are, with the antecedents included:
> 1. The document is licensed as CC BY-NC-SA, so you would need to
> relicense it as OPL 1.0 [2] for the Fedora Documentation Project to use
> it.
[2] http://opencontent.org/openpub/
> 2. The document would benefit from style editing. If you are
> interested in improving the readability of your document, check a good
> style manual, or even a simple Linux community one like the GNOME
> Documentation Style Guidelines [1]. If you join the FDP and relicense
> the doc for use here, I would be happy to work with you on this.
[1] http://developer.gnome.org/documents/style-guide/index.html
--
Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
Fedora Project Board: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board
Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part