Re: KDE inclusion

["John Babich" <jmbabich gmail com>]

LOL!!

Sorry, I'm been reading too much industry news lately.

Please substitute the acronym DUG for FUD in my last posting.

John Babich

On 11/28/06, John Babich <jmbabich gmail com> wrote:
> On 11/28/06, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram fedoraproject org> wrote:
>
> > The documentation team needs to carefully look at the effects of this
> > proposal - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraSummit/ReleaseProcess.
> > Modularizing content the same way the packages are done allowing people
> > to somehow specify "dependencies" might work.
>
> I agree that we need to avoid a monolithic document. We should continue
> to produce specific modules (GNOME, KDE, Xfce) which can perhaps be
> dynamically linked to produce a custom doc (for instance, FUD with a KDE
> flavor).
>
> How to do it still escapes me. Perhaps using INCLUDEs with some scripting
> would do the trick.
>
> John Babich