Voting System Conflicts

[Vladimir Kosovac]

Karsten Wade wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 07:06 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote:
>> As per this consensus, we'll proceed until the previously decided
>> nomination closing time (23:59 UTC today) to see if enough candidates
>> appear to stand for FDSCo election.  If not, we'll postpone FDSCo
>> elections until the end of the month, freeing up the voting system for
>> others to use.
> 
> I'm a bit torn here, showing my indecisive side quite clearly:
> 
> * We have not enough candidates for an election (3 nominations, 3 seats,
> so voting isn't useful)
> 
6 ought to be enough for anybody!

:-) Vladimir

> * To fill up the nominations is feeling very rushed, with four hours
> left to go
> 
> * People on this project are not fully aware of the election
> 
> * Serious people have put up their names for nomination, and they
> deserve respect and a fair/useful election
> 
> * Putting off until 24 Dec. or later for elections really means we want
> to wait until the New Year, which is _very_far_off_ our schedule of
> "just after the release."  Oops.
> 
> * FAMSCo seems ready to go and chomping at the bit
> 
> * If we postpone we risk losing the momentum we have
> 
> * Someone is potentially upset with the outcome no matter what the
> decision
> 
> Oops, sorry, the last point is just my "place of always being stuck" as
> a leader. :)
> 
> Tick tick tick ...
> 
> - Karsten
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 251 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20071213/333e5a50/attachment.sig>