Re: conduct of meetings and voting in FDSCo

["John Babich" <jmbabich gmail com>]

On 3/4/07, Karsten Wade <kwade redhat com> wrote:
< snip >
> Because decisions are not the focus of an IRC meeting, it means that
> FDSCo can have meetings at dual-times to cover all members timezones,
> and there is not an obligation to attend.  Discussion and decision is
> pushed to IRC. But there is room to make decisions in a fair manner.
>
> Then our fixed meeting time/window becomes a place to:
>
> 1. Check/update status
> 2. Regroup and reissue the week's agenda
>
> The outcome of this fixed meeting is:
>
> 1. A log to IRC
> 2. An updated of scheduled tasks
> 3. A new thread for the week that details the new/updated agenda under
> discussion/decision
>
> Thoughts?

As long as the IRC meetings can alternate and cover all the participants,
I'm in agreement.

John Babich
Volunteer, Fedora Docs Project