Re: Page naming question - follow up to RFC

["Clint Savage" <herlo1 gmail com>]

On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 11:22 AM, David Nalley
<david nalley fedoraproject org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Currently the page
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Help:Wiki_Structure#Page_naming has two
> different naming conventions, one for end-user docs, and one for
> non-end-user docs.
> The above says that single level nesting is ok for non-end-user
> sub-projects. ie, we could have
> /Ambassadors/Requirements_for_NA_Ambassadors (old style would have
> been /Ambassadors/NA/Requirements). And that end user docs is more
> akin to the RFC suggested style. The RFC iirc, says that page naming
> should be more akin to "A__Docs_Project_page_named_something_better"
> and abandon the /DocsProject/Pages/Better/Named/Because/Nested/A
> model.

As I understand it that is the model being discussed right now by the
Docs project.  I chatted with Ian Weller about this, but they've not
yet confirmed they are going this way quite yet.

Cheers,

Clint