On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 14:24 +1000, Christopher Curran wrote:
Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
Any comments on this?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/AccountSystem#Account_Termination
Mike is setting some policy[1] as per a thread on f-advisory-board[2].
[1] http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2008-September/msg00001.html
[2] http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2008-August/msg00122.html
Feel free to edit that content if you see something that is clear, or
send your comments back here. I believe Mike is subscribed to this
list, so we can get his input when needed.
- Karsten
Line 2:
These freedoms, however, do not include the right to deceive,
manipulate or otherwise *change* the processes and procedures Fedora
has in place.
So the rules can never change, those with power never leave and anyone
who questions them is out? I'd consider revising to make it less
transcendental and more concrete. Add detailed boundaries of what is
wrong and why it is harmful. For example: vandalism, deliberately
creating security issues, self promotion, harassment, and so on.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/AccountSystem#Account_Termination
I made a couple changes -- see if that helps. I am not necessarily in
favor of detailing specific violations because our definitions may
differ (or be incorrect). I don't believe it's vital that we do so,
either, in order to retain the rights to terminate accounts.
Nevertheless, I'm going to shoot a note to Fedora Legal to see whether
any further text might be required.