Re: Fedora 10 Docs Schedule

[John Poelstra <poelstra redhat com>]

Kevin Kofler said the following on 09/18/2008 11:28 AM Pacific Time:
> John Poelstra <poelstra <at> redhat.com> writes:
> > Did you have any comments on the tasks prior to Beta?  I'd like to get 
> > those right too so that building F11 is on auto-pilot :)
>
> Coming from a developer / beat writer standpoint here: One thing which should 
> be clearer is when exactly the beats stop targeting Fn release note errata and 
> start targeting Fn+1 (currently n=9). Because we want to make sure our changes 
> for Fn+1 end up in the Fn+1 release notes, but we don't want them in the Fn 
> release note errata! And if the point where we're targeting F10 already 
> happened, then can the wiki please be fixed not to refer to F9 all over the 
> Docs/Beats front page? This is something I already complained about in the F9 
> cycle.

I'm all ears.  If someone can provide the new dates and idea behind them 
(what they are based on) I can add them.

One of these views might provide helpful perspective.
http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-10/f-10-docs-tasks.html
http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-10/f-10-releng-tasks.html

John