Re: What is the purpose of a Docs CMS?

[Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay <foss mailinglists gmail com>]

On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Karsten Wade <kwade redhat com> wrote:

> Our current system is essentially checking rendered content in to
> source control, and an auto-builder puts it on the web.  Historically,
> this system was never well adopted, even by people who otherwise know
> and understand the tools.  Instead, easier to use tools have drawn the
> attention and content, such as wikis and blogs.  The adoption rates
> are staggering by comparison.

I am sure that I have missed this somewhere, but what are the specific
pain points that make the source_control_toolchain_builder driven
system not adoption ready ?


-- 

http://www.gutenberg.net - Fine literature digitally re-published
http://www.plos.org - Public Library of Science
http://www.creativecommons.org - Flexible copyright for creative work