Re: Removing inactive members from the Docs FAS Group

[Mike Danko <mike l4m3 com>]

As others have mentioned, since they're inactive in FAS, there might be
some hoop jumping to get a hold of them, but I can only assume that
since the FAS accounts have been removed, they don't want to be
involved, and can't work on things anyway. 

Dropping a FAS account is the quickest way to get un-involved I suppose.
Does dropping your account release you from the CLA? If so, should you
NOT contact these people?

On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 14:22 -0400, Eric Christensen wrote:
> The following members of the Docs FAS Group are showing as inactive in
> FAS.  Is there any reason to NOT remove these users from the Docs group?
> 
> zachfedora
> sopwith
> mumumu
> mcgiwer
> dpniner
> mattb
> csellers
> clennert
> mjbrej
> ddeutsch
> sfolkwil
> manix
> rmoreira
> splinux
> acapur
> rue
> cepxat
> drpixel
> gawain
> mbrennan
> naga
> bbcradio
> andrew
> kburtsev
> fcrhuser
> dtypald
> vmlinz
> jmtaylor
> denity
> kwade
> angelven
> mcisback
> rbianchi
> xiaoshao
> laong
> sfaure
> eitch
> ghenry
> anukul
> vglafirov
> shivakant
> jjesse
> 
> Thanks,
> Eric
>