[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Wikipedia license change
- From: "John J. McDonough" <wb8rcr arrl net>
- To: "For participants of the Documentation Project" <fedora-docs-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Wikipedia license change
- Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:47:37 -0400
----- Original Message -----
From: "Karsten Wade" <kwade redhat com>
To: <fedora-docs-list redhat com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: Wikipedia license change
> > "Wikipedia drops GNU in favor of Creative Commons license"
>
> So, can Fedora Docs and Fedora on the whole switch to Creative Commons
> SA license from OPL? There doesn't seem to be any real blockers to the
> move.
If we get consensus on this list to switch from OPL to CC-BY-SA, then
I'll take the word to the Board. Not that I think we need approval,
per se, but a simple heads up is a good idea. :)
[--clip--]
The OPL has served us very well for a long time, I'm sad to see us
move from it, but at this point the writing is clear. We gain a lot
by going with a proper CC license.
So, what do we gain by going to CC? What do we loose? I have heard some
folks on Planet objecting to CC for some purposes, but I would need to go
back and re-read what their problem was and in what context.
--McD
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]