Meeting minutes - 16/09/2005

Paul W. Frields stickster at gmail.com
Mon Sep 19 14:19:26 UTC 2005


Reply to post from f-marketing-l:

On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 15:07 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 17:34 -0400, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> >  if you keep that color
> > you'll need to use it for another subproject.
> 
> The Documentation Project might like to take that color, seeing as we
> are otherwise unrepresented, and it's kind of pretty.
> 
> However, we might want to pause and see what emotions are attached to
> those colors and see that the colors fit.  Or is that too touchy-feely
> for email?
> 
> http://www.capstrat.com/development/fedora/fedoraLogo_14.jpg
> 
> I like the red of "core4" for Core.  Having "project" and "foundation"
> the same color makes sense, they are nearly synonymous.
> 
> Extras will need a new color, or it will clash with Legacy green.  The
> magenta might do best for Extras, as it's a "variation" on the red.
> Sort-of within the same visual palette.
> 
> What other colors do we have?  What happens when we "run out" of colors?
> Should we have some scheme for picking colors within palettes?

How about a charcoal-dark gray (black may be too pronounced) for Docs?
That color would be reminiscent of black-on-white text and not a bad
choice for FDP.

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-dsco-list/attachments/20050919/61b589c6/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-dsco-list mailing list