proposed new time, meeting rules

[Karsten Wade]

On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 20:00 -0700, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
> Uttered Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com>, spake thus:
> 
> > New proposed time; how does this work for Tommy and Hugh (other active
> > members)?
> > 5 pm PDT/8 pm EDT/Midnight UTC
> 
> I can handle 17:00PDT most days.  I'm going in at 6:00AM usually and
> unless I work overtime, I'm out by 14:30 or so...

OK, we're sticking with Tuesdays but moving to the new time.

>  > New proposal would allow a meeting to continue with at least two
> > committee members present, and we all agree not to make any drastic
> > decisions without more members present.  Call this the "abandoning anal
> > quorum" proposal.
> 
> OK by me.

That's 'yes' from myself, Tommy, and Paul.  IIRC, Bob agreed as well.
So, we can put this into effect next time.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor    ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-dsco-list/attachments/20060830/630a4837/attachment.sig>