On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 13:56 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 23:39 -0600, Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote: > > > > I've put together some SRPMs for Asterisk that I hope to get imported > > into Fedora Extras. I'd appreciate any feedback on the packaging that > > you have. The SRPMS can be found at <http://www.ocjtech.us/asterisk/>. > > 403. Doh! Serves me right for not testing first. > I'd like to see Asterisk in Extras. Yay! > Also capi4k-utils, chan_capi, and Yep. > spandsp. There might be a problem with patents. See <http://www.ocjtech.us/asterisk/spandsp/DueDiligence>. That said, I do have a package for SpanDSP but it's not linked into my Asterisk packages (due to the patent issues). > I should finish beating chan_bluetooth into shape and that can > be packaged too; I do at least have it doing duplex audio fairly sanely > now. Yep. > I'd like to see mISDN packaged but that wants to go into Linus' kernel > and hence into the standard kernel RPM -- and before that can happen, it > needs to stop being quite so broken. > > The zaptel kernel parts want feeding to Linus too, assuming they're in a > good enough state for that -- I haven't looked at them at all yet. I agree that having kernel drivers in the stock kernels is a good thing. The main question is would Digium support that. > If possible, we need to lose the dependency which chan_iax2 has on the > zap driver. If it's only used for timing, we should investigate the > POSIX timer functionality which is available with newer kernel/glibc. Agreed. Jeff
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part