Re: ulog not on ppc?

[David Woodhouse <dwmw2 infradead org>]

On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 08:12 -1000, Warren Togami wrote:
> Until we have a feasible way of giving arch login accounts for testing 
> purposes to anybody, we cannot possibly expect blocking on archs. 
> Unless you want dozens of bugs filed "not built on x86_64 and ppc 
> because it is untested"?

I wouldn't suggest that we refrain from building a package on a given
architecture merely because it's untested. I'm suggesting that if there
are known reasons for _not_ building on a given arch, there must be a
bug filed.

-- 
dwmw2