[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: request for review: xdaliclock
- From: Aaron Kurtz <a kurtz hardsun net>
- To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: request for review: xdaliclock
- Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 13:52:44 -0700
On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 08:29 -0400, Chris Ricker wrote:
> <http://www.oobleck.net/kaboom/fedora/srpms/xdaliclock-2.20-1.src.rpm>
>
> Anyone want to review / sponsor?
Builds, installs, runs on FC4t2. Wasn't this in RH before and therefore
technically doesn't need a sponsor? Of course, that was back in 7.3 or
so.
>Source0: http://www.jwz.org/xdaliclock/xdaliclock-%{version}.tar.gz
Isn't the convention to have the source not use macros?
--
Aaron Kurtz <a kurtz hardsun net GPG Key ID: ED588CF2
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]