Re: Regarding noarch packages

[seth vidal <skvidal phy duke edu>]

On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 21:30 +0200, Matthias Saou wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> While trying to rebuild a package on x86_64 development that requires
> scons to build, I noticed that scons, which is a noarch packages, is only
> present in the i386 directory, not the x86_64 one.
> 
> So I guess this is possibly just something seth missed if it's "manually
> done" ;-) But otherwise, we may need some way of being sure that all
> noarch packages appear for all archs, or maybe some way of letting the
> tree populating script know on which arches a noarch package is relevant
> (for instance, I have some firmware packages that are needed only for x86
> hardware, so although they are noarch, they aren't relevant on other
> platforms).
> 

The buildsystem code I posted last night already handles SOME of that.
Noarch are only built once and moved into all of the arch directories.

You're right scons was probably just a screw up on my part.

-sv