[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: D1x license
- From: Matthew Miller <mattdm mattdm org>
- To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: D1x license
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 12:08:31 -0400
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 09:55:19AM -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> A LOT of scientific and mathematical code is licensed as "Free for
> non-commercial use". If we can't include it in FE, I'd understand. I'll
> just have to email a lot of maintainers to beg for a license change.
Yeah, I know it's a pretty common restriction. But, if we want to move more
of Core to Extras (and I think pretty much everyone agrees we do), and make
Extras easily selected from anaconda, Extras effectively become part of the
basic distribution that vendors might want to actually provide. And having a
single package in Extras with this restriction would then basically restrict
all of Fedora.
--
Matthew Miller mattdm mattdm org <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
Current office temperature: 74 degrees Fahrenheit.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]