[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Request for review: glpk
- From: Ed Hill <ed eh3 com>
- To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Request for review: glpk
- Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 08:47:29 -0400
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 09:02 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 12:55 -0500, Quentin Spencer wrote:
> > Unfortunately, it doesn't work, as illustrated by the following excerpt
> > from config.log:
> > configure:8588: checking glpk.h usability
> > configure:8600: gcc -c -I/usr/include/glpk conftest.c >&5
> > <snip>
> > configure:8633: checking glpk.h presence
> > configure:8643: gcc -E conftest.c
> >
> > For some reason, the second check throws out the flags that I passed in.
> > I have to admit I don't know much about autotools.
> > Is this normal in a configure script?
> No, conversely, configure scripts are supposed to accept several flags
> such as CPPFLAGS, CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS, LDFLAGS etc. and are not supposed to
> override them, but ... I have seen better configure scripts than
> octave's ;)
So, lets help upstream improve it. ;-) Will they accept patches? I'll
take a look and try to whip one up later this week.
Ed
--
Edward H. Hill III, PhD
office: MIT Dept. of EAPS; Rm 54-1424; 77 Massachusetts Ave.
Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
emails: eh3 mit edu ed eh3 com
URLs: http://web.mit.edu/eh3/ http://eh3.com/
phone: 617-253-0098
fax: 617-253-4464
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]