Re: Request for review/approval: libetpan (new dependency for sylpheed-claws)

[Michael Schwendt <bugs michael gmx net>]

On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 12:36:24 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:

> On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 11:03:53 +0200, Andreas Bierfert wrote:
> 
> > Should all be taken care of now:
> 
> Yes, almost.
>  
> > http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/libetpan-0.38-2.src.rpm
> > http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/libetpan.spec
> 
> GNU TLS and OpenSSL support in libetpan are "either or", so when
> it's built --with-gnutls, openssl-devel is not needed.
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/164934 -- libgnutls-openssl contains
> undefined symbols. We have an external libtasn1 in Extras and could
> use it for an ugly hack. But I believe this ought to be fixed in Core
> instead. The first response from the Core packager was discouraging.

The second response to bug 164934 tells me, GNU TLS for FC4 and older is a
dead end and --with-gnutls=no and openssl-devel shall be the work-around.

Does any other package in FC4 use libgnutls-openssl?