[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: rpms/graphviz/devel graphviz.spec,1.14,1.15
- From: Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 freenet de>
- To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Cc: fedora-extras-commits redhat com
- Subject: Re: rpms/graphviz/devel graphviz.spec,1.14,1.15
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 19:15:39 +0200
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 13:06 -0400, John Ellson wrote:
> Oliver Falk wrote:
>
> > On 08/29/2005 03:16 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 07:33 -0400, Oliver Falk wrote:
> >>
> >>> Author: oliver
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> Index: graphviz.spec
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> +BuildRequires: /bin/ksh bison m4 flex tcl-devel >= 8.3
> >>> tk-devel swig
> >>
> >>
> >> What's the reason for BR'ing /bin/ksh?
> >>
> >> I can't imagine a single reason for doing so under Linux.
> >
> >
> > I took that from the specfile that comes with graphviz and didn't
> > think to much about it - it also was there since I took over
> > graphviz... Maybe John knows why!?
> >
> > Best,
> > Oliver
>
>
>
> Tritely, because ksh was invented here
;)
> and its too hard convincing people here to use
> bash. As I recall, iffe depends on it.
Well, I'd suggest you to extend your configure script to detect a
suitable shell (I guess you actually are looking for shell supporting
for some features which were missing in the original Bourne shell 10
years+ ago),
or FE should simply sed the /bin/ksh to /bin/bash or even /bin/sh from
the sources inside of the rpm spec.
Ralf
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]