On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 16:48 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 09:31 -0400, John Ellson wrote: > > > > > > > > >>To be honest I'm feeeling some burnout and this is not the technical > > >>issue that I want to work on.... > > >> > > >> > > >Pardon, but what's so complicated about adding a one line sed to an > > >rpm.spec? > > > > > > > > > > Its unlikely to be that simple. As I understand it, ksh has > > capabilities not in bash. > Which? I am not aware of any. > > Even if, I'd call relying on them "broken design", esp. if considering > that ksh had been closed source until not too far ago. If someone has a package that has ksh scripts, I don't think requiring that they rewrite them to bash scripts is a reasonable packaging requirement, considering that ksh is part of fedora-core now. The details of ksh *are* different. The fact that bash is at least as capable, if not more so is not really relevant. Regards, Owen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part