[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Bug 173105] Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin
- From: bugzilla redhat com
- To: fedora-extras-list redhat com
- Subject: [Bug 173105] Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin
- Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 08:50:22 -0500
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173105
------- Additional Comments From fedora wickert arcor de 2005-12-01 08:50 EST -------
Reply from Upstream:
Benedikt Meurer (author of xfce4-sample-plugin) said that the COPYING (BSD) file
is only a relict from his sample plugin and since LGPL is more restrictive it
should be applied to the whole package.
Edscott Wilson Garcia (one of the programs authors) wrote:
"Yes. Libraries are LGPL, as released in such manner by their initial
author. The program source file is BSD, since that is what the initial
author (Nicholas Penwarden) thought best."
Debian ships this package as BSD
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/x/xfce4-battery-plugin/xfce4-battery-plugin_0.3.0-1/xfce4-battery-plugin.copyright
So should we release it LGPL? Do I have to replace the COPYING file then?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]