[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Bug 173105] Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin
- From: bugzilla redhat com
- To: fedora-extras-list redhat com
- Subject: [Bug 173105] Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin
- Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 12:58:37 -0500
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173105
------- Additional Comments From rc040203 freenet de 2005-12-01 12:58 EST -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> Since the package has both LGPL (the acpi/apm lib files) and BSD (the main
> battstat.c file), it should have both in the spec License... BSD and LGPL.
>
> I would leave the BSD liscence in the COPYING file (as it is upstream), but
> perhaps add a LGPL copying file in as well?
>
> Then, spec can have: License: BSD and LGPL
Sorry, nope. If binary package having been built from sources containing
[L]GPL'ed and other licensed source files, automatically is [L]GPL'ed as a whole.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]