[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Bug 173105] Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin
- From: bugzilla redhat com
- To: fedora-extras-list redhat com
- Subject: [Bug 173105] Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin
- Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 13:54:37 -0500
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173105
------- Additional Comments From pertusus free fr 2005-12-01 13:54 EST -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> > Sorry, nope. If binary package having been built from sources containing
> > [L]GPL'ed and other licensed source files, automatically is [L]GPL'ed
> > as a whole.
More precisely the whole is redistributed under the terms of the LGPL. But the
BSD licenced files remain BSD licenced. So it is more informative to put BSD and
LGPL in the licence. The BSD copyright/licence statement is added in the %doc
section (it is the COPYING file), there is a LGPL so things are fine.
Incidentally the
panel-plugin/libacpi.c
has a GPL header?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]