[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

[Bug 173105] Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173105





------- Additional Comments From fedora leemhuis info  2005-12-01 14:27 EST -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > > Sorry, nope. If binary package having been built from sources containing
> > > [L]GPL'ed and other licensed source files, automatically is [L]GPL'ed 
> > > as a whole.
> 
> More precisely the whole is redistributed under the terms of the LGPL.

Then "License" field in the rpm spec imho should only be "LGPL" because it
stands for the whole package. Otherwise someone might get the idea that the
whole package is under a Dual-BSD/LGPL license. And thats wrong afaics.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]