Re: New Packages and a New Layout in Fedora Extras

[Michael Schwendt <fedora wir-sind-cool org>]

On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:00:44 +0100, Matthias Saou wrote:

> seth vidal wrote :
> 
> > We've also reorganized a little bit for the migration to official
> > 'extras' status.
> > 
> > The directory hierarchy looks like this:
> [...]
> 
> Cool. I've noticed you also cleaned up the packages to remove obsolete
> builds it seems. Similarly, I think the x86_64 build logs would need
> cleaning up, since I wanted to go through them to see if there were any
> bugs I already knew about and could fix, but many of the logs are old or
> strange and correspond to packages that are successfully built. For
> instance :
> 
> camE
> caca-utils (very weird, shouldn't it be "libcaca"?)
> libcaca-devel
> 
> Those a probably remains of when imlib2 wasn't rebuilt yet, but have all
> been rebuilt since. At a glance, same goes for gpgme and related packages,
> and certainly others.

Please don't request a rebuild for gpgme, because it's too late now, as
CVS in a development type of state for these packages. Transition to gpgme
1.0 is in progress. The old gpgme 0.4.x would not rebuild on x86_64
because it depends on newpg, which in turn fails in one of the tests. The
work-around has been explained on fedora-devel, but has only been
implemented for gpgme03 in favour of moving to GPGME 1.0 and GnuPG 2.