Re: Anjuta deps

[Matthias Saou <thias spam spam spam spam spam spam spam egg and spam freshrpms net>]

Michael Schwendt wrote :

> What do you think? Should it also require autoconf, automake and what
else
> it may run in its autogen scripts? IIRC, we've had the topic before
> somewhere, and if some of the tools are considered optional, a separate
> anjuta-foo meta package could pull in a complete build environment.

Well, I don't really like meta-packages, and anjuta's main targets are
definitely C/C++ programmers, so it would make sense to me. But I'm sure
plenty of others will think otherwise ;-)

Matthias

-- 
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) - Linux kernel 2.6.10-1.753_FC3
Load : 0.03 0.34 0.64