Ok, maybe stupid to assume nobody follows it, but I haven't seen any packages that actually follow it. Dan On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 20:03 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 11:37:23 -0600, Daniel Wittenberg wrote: > > > I'm certainly open to making the changes if you want to send them my > > way. Once they are pushed into the main cvs for snort then hopefully it > > shouldn't need to be updated again. > > > > Can we dump the stupid naming convention since it appears nobody really > > follows it anyway? > > It's stupid to assume that "nobody really follows it". Every package at > fedora.us follows it with good reason. Fedora Extras no longer needs to > follow it, and hence the 0.fdr. prefix is gone. > > -- > fedora-extras-list mailing list > fedora-extras-list redhat com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part