On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 13:26 -0600, Daniel Wittenberg wrote: > This includes using fdr in the package name, which nobody really follows > anyway, which is why I think it's stupid as a standard because nobody > follows it include the official Fedora package maintainers. If it is > legacy it should be removed. Wasn't that addressed in Michael's reply? On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 20:03 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > It's stupid to assume that "nobody really follows it". Every package at > fedora.us follows it with good reason. Fedora Extras no longer needs to > follow it, and hence the 0.fdr. prefix is gone. /B -- Brian Pepple <bdpepple ameritech net>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part