[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Epoch policy
- From: seth vidal <skvidal phy duke edu>
- To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Cc: fedora-packaging redhat com
- Subject: Re: Epoch policy
- Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:24:49 -0500
On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 16:53 +0100, Aurelien Bompard wrote:
>Hi all
>
>In the new PackageNamingGuidelines, there is nothing about epochs. What is
>the new Extras policy regarding Epochs ? New packages should be created
>without Epochs, but what about Fedora.us imported packages ? Should I drop
>Epoch in the next releases ? Should I do it only for the devel branch ?
1. Look on the fedora-packaging list for the discussion
2. my guess is:
a. if the fedora.us package had a non-zero epoch it needs to be
maintained - just so users have an upgrade path
b. if the fedora.us package had an Epoch: 0 drop it and remove
%{epoch} from anyplace you have it in ver strings.
I'm cc'ing the packaging list to see if that seems right to them.
-sv
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]