[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: xv-docs shouldn't be in Fedora Extras 3?



On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 20:13 -0500, Charles R. Anderson wrote:
> Fedora PreExtras 3 has an xv-docs package available, with no 
> corresponding xv package (required by xv-docs).  I find no component 
> in Fedora Extras 3 bugzilla to file a bug on this...
> 
> Maybe a "distribution" component should be added to bugzilla, like
> there is for Core?


1. this is best addressed on the fedora-extras-list

2. xv-docs should be removed too, xv and xv-docs are not legally
acceptable for extras. I'll clean up xv-docs, too, thanks.

-sv

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]