[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Request for review: koffice
- From: Andreas Bierfert <andreas bierfert lowlatency de>
- To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Request for review: koffice
- Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 12:49:01 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Rex Dieter wrote:
> For the love of all that is holy, please package the langpack files
> separately (altogether or separate src.rpm's I don't care, just as long
> as they are .noarch.rpm's), and follow upstream naming.
Befor I do that...
- - build of language stuff ties in with koffice nicely
- - ooo langpack files are within the main package as well
- - naming is exactly like ooo naming which IMHO is better for fedora users
Just some points for you to understand why I did it this way. Any other comments
on the more important parts of the spec file?
- - Andreas
- --
Andreas Bierfert | http://awbsworld.de | GPG: C58CF1CB
andreas bierfert lowlatency de | http://lowlatency.de | signed/encrypted
phone: +49 2402 102373 | cell: +49 172 9789968 | mail preferred
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCxR+dQEQyPsWM8csRApAdAJ4hVrTteqL1jNRfdabnvC5PwvDltwCeKhdb
8vrAoisBpSMEhwxuoKYsCjk=
=vzHV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]